The courtroom in Act three is a crucial point in the play where each character is put under pressure and this exposes each of their weaknesses. The effect of the tense courtroom environment forces the audience to speculate on the reactions of all the characters.
How to Write a Summary of an Article? In the play, Abigail and several other young women accuse innocent citizens of Salem for the action of witchcraft. During the trials, many individuals were unfairly persecuted; such as John Proctor.
When Miller compares the character of John Proctor to himself, the reader is able to relate the similar experiences that both men faced. The Crucible demonstrates the struggle against corruption involving the court, which lead to the death of many innocent individuals in Salem.
Arthur Miller uses several writing methods in order to convey The Crucible as an allegory for his struggles with McCarthyism. Miller demonstrates how the Crucible represents an allegory for his conflict with McCarthyism by relating his experiences with the plot of the novel.
He is showing the similarity between his experience with the trials involving the Red Scare, and the trials in Salem. The witchcraft trials were very much alike the communism suspicions in the United States, in which many individuals were falsely accused for crimes they had not committed.
When the devil came to you did you see Rebecca Nurse in his company? Miller uses the technique of connecting the two experiences together by incorporating the approaches in which the court took to obtain valuable information.
We will protect you. Miller relates this technique to his experience with the court in which they attempted to make him feel protected, if he would reveal his knowledge.
This proves that the court did whatever they could to extract information from the suspects. Arthur Miller is clarifying the fact that as the trials continued, the more strict and severe the court became.
This often caused for false accusations against innocent citizens. As the trials developed, the courts were able to establish their own conclusions stemmed from the proceedings. Arthur Miller is able to develop an allegory from the play to his experience with several strategies.
He relates the actions of the court to the way in which the court treated him. In conclusion, Miller used many effective tactics to create a compelling allegory of his struggles against McCarthyism in the novel, The Crucible.This persuasive essay will explain how John Proctor is a tragic hero in the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller, by showing how his tragic flaw, actually lead him in the right direction to become the hero.
John Proctor shows his personality of a tragic hero by being very ethical with his peers, but not perfect. The Crucible by Arthur Miller.
The Crucible is seen as a political parable that compares two “awful chapters” in American and human history. The Crucible by Arthur Miller Essay Words | 20 Pages The Crucible by Arthur Miller John Proctor says, I'll tell you what's walking Salem, vengeance is walking Salem.
Miller presents the relationship between John and Elizabeth Proctor as an element which develops and changes in the course of the play.
The relationship doesn’t change a lot but it changes a bit but at the end of the play goes back to how it was in the beginning of the play. The novel, The Crucible was written in by Arthur Miller, which was based on the Salem Witch Trials existing in the late s.
In the play, Abigail and several other young women accuse innocent citizens of Salem for the action of witchcraft. During the trials, many individuals were unfairly persecuted; such as John Proctor. John Proctor as Tragic Hero of Arthur Miller's The Crucible In the play, The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, John Proctor fits the classic Greek definition of a tragic hero.
Aristotle, one of the great Greek philosophers, teachers and writers, stated that one of the most important aspects of a tragedy was the tragic hero.